Monday, October 19, 2009

Parents in Balloon Case Expect to Surrender

FORT COLLINS, Colo. — The parents accused of concocting a publicity stunt by pretending their young son had climbed aboard a homemade helium balloon and was hurtling through the Colorado skies will surrender to the authorities as soon as charges are filed, the lawyer for the father said Monday.
David Lane, a Colorado civil rights and defense lawyer who is representing the father, Richard Heene, said both Mr. Heene and his wife, Mayumi, would plead not guilty and would turn themselves in to avoid further public spectacle. Mr. Lane contended that placing handcuffs on the Heenes, in the full glare of the news media and for their children to see, would be abusive to the youngsters.
The case became a national sensation last Thursday, when the Heenes frantically reported that their 6-year-old son, Falcon, had climbed into the silver flying saucer his father built in their backyard here and had drifted into the sky, prompting a wide-scale search. The child was later said to have been home the whole time.
The Heenes, who had appeared on the show “Wife Swap,” have made no secret of their television aspirations. At a news conference on Sunday, the Larimer County sheriff, Jim Alderden, said the entire series of events had been an elaborate hoax drummed up by the Heenes to gain attention and leverage for a reality TV show.
Among the charges the Heenes might face, the sheriff said, are three felonies: conspiracy to commit a crime, contributing to the delinquency of a minor and attempt to influence a public servant. The last carries a possible prison term of six years.
A spokeswoman for the Sheriff’s Office, Eloise B. Campanella, said in a statement Monday that the office did not expect to wrap up its investigation and present the case to the district attorney until next week.
Mr. Lane said that he had not seen any evidence gathered by officials and that he hoped the Sheriff’s Office would give the Heenes a chance to turn themselves in, given the intense interest in the case.
Ms. Heene’s lawyer, Lee E. Christian of Fort Collins, would not comment beyond Mr. Lane’s comments.
Amid speculation that local child protection authorities would become involved in the case, Mr. Lane said, “I have seen no indication that these kids are anything but well-treated and well-loved kids.”
In another twist to the case, the gossip Web site Gawker paid a 25-year-old Denver man, Robert Thomas, to write about his experience working with Mr. Heene, whom Mr. Thomas described as a business associate.
In the account posted on Gawker, Mr. Thomas said he and Mr. Heene had drawn up a pitch for a reality television show centered on off-kilter science experiments. The two planned to pitch the idea to the producers of “Wife Swap,” Mr. Thomas said.
One proposed episode was based on the launching of a flying saucer to lure U.F.O.’s, according to a treatment written by Mr. Thomas and posted on Gawker.
“This will be the most significant U.F.O.-related news event to take place since the Roswell Crash of 1947, and the result will be a dramatic increase in local and national awareness about the Heene family, our reality series, as well as the U.F.O. phenomenon in general,” Mr. Thomas wrote in the treatment.
In an interview on Monday night, Mr. Thomas described how he had spent the better part of two months at the Heene home collaborating on a variety of science projects, most prominently the idea for the reality TV show.
Mr. Thomas described Mr. Heene as obsessed with fame and wild theories, among them that the upper echelon of the American government was actually a race of alien beings called shape-shifters.
Mr. Thomas painted a portrait of a chaotic household, with Mr. Heene conducting experiments, children running around and a dog barking. But he said the children never appeared afraid of their father.
Mr. Heene was especially excited about the U.F.O. episode, Mr. Thomas said.
“When this was all over the news,” he said of the balloon incident, “the first thing that came to my mind was how it is extremely unlikely that he would have conceived of an idea so similar, and then months later this freak accident manifests.”
Neither Mr. Thomas nor Gabriel Snyder, editor in chief for Gawker, would disclose how much Mr. Thomas had been paid to write for the Web site.
Linda Lee, a lawyer representing Mr. Thomas, said Mr. Thomas had spoken with sheriff’s investigators about the case for about an hour on Sunday evening.
Sheriff’s officials did not return calls about Mr. Thomas’s remarks.
Except for a slew of news trucks parked outside the Heene home, there was little sign of the family on Monday. A sign posted on their front door asked reporters to stay away. Another one taped to the house said “Civil liberties: don’t leave home without them,” and a third said “Parental rights, parental rights, parental rights.” A box for letters of support for the family rested on the front doorstep.

7 comments:

  1. People will do anything for publicity. However, I think the charges against them are overboard. We all know this is wrong but come on "OJ" walked away as a free man.... and these people could go to jail for something like this? They just wanted a tv show. They lied. They didn't actually put their child in harms way. They should be slapped with a VERY hefty fine and maybe even sued for flight cancelations and etc. but years of jail time is extreme.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Although I agree with Nadera, as far as the individual incedent with the ballon being a pulicity stunt, I would have to disagree with the idea that they haven't put the childrens lives in harms way. They are storm chasers. They bring their children along with them while doing this. Mother nature is so unpredictible that if this isn't putting your children in harms way I don't know what is. I think the biggest problem with this case will be if there is a jury trial trying to find people who do not have an opinion on the case.

    ReplyDelete
  3. When i said they didn't put their children in harms way, I was refering to the actual publicity stunt itself, not their storm chasing. I agree with you on the storm chasing. However, they are not being tried for that.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Completely understood. I just believe that with all the other issue the couple has placed themselves in it could very well be brought up to destroy the character of the couple during a trial.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree. I think that the jail time is a little extreme. I think there should be some consequence, but if they were Angelina and Brad or some other wealthy couple, would the consequence be the same?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree that six years in jail could be a little much. However, these people did allegedly commit three felony crimes, as well as several possible misdemeanors. They wasted a considerable amount of money and countless hours in search efforts for PUBLICITY. they exploited their six year old child for a potential reality TV show. I am not sure that I am opposed to them facing jail time. What message are we sending if we do not punish the Heenes?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Jail time? That will be the judge for to decide, like Lindsay said they did commit three felony crimes which is hefty, this is all for publicity and it seems to have gone way to far. Something has to be done to stop this mess.

    ReplyDelete