I'm not sure it's necessary for the courts to be involved in this case, or cases like this. An employee was using a company owned phone for personal use and that is unacceptable. He did pay for the overage charges, but nevertheless, he and others were told that texts would be treated the same as emails and subject to monitoring. I don't think Quon's case holds water...it was not his personal phone. If he wanted to send his wife explicit texts and have an affair, he should've done it from his personal phone. If anyone thinks that no one is reading their emails/texts sent from company computers or phones, think again! :)
High court goes high tech: Justices to hear employee texting case - Yahoo! News
Friday, April 16, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment